I've been struggling to come up with the right words to think and talk about reading "traditional music" vs the tabs for chromatic harmonica. Is this how to name these things or is there some other more precise way to talk about how musical instructions are expressed in written form? Thanks Grace
I have never seen a tablature that, in and of itself, is precise. It provides the following items, which standard notation does not:
1. hole numbers
2. slide position
3. breath direction
which, by themselves, are next to useless.
Tablature relies on one important factor: A foreknowledge of what the tune sounds like. This can take the form of a recording or a remembrance (aural image).
Only then will a player know:
1. what the rhythms are
2. what the range is
3. what the tempo is
5. what the dynamics are
6. what the mood is
7. how to articulate the notes
8. even what the original key is
which, after many repetitions, gives a player an idea of what it should sound like. And all of which can be written accurately on a sheet of paper, incorporated into standard notation.
Henry, if you tabbed out an unfamiliar piece, leaving the words out, would anyone be able to play it? What you're doing is great, and much appreciated, but it relies on peoples' familiarity with the tunes to begin with. Including a recording with some of your tabs is a fine adjunct.
A combination of tab and standard notation may increase tab's usefulness and accuracy. Unfortunately, I'm not set up to demonstrate this. It would take some music copying software, which I don't have on this computer.
Given the hole numbers, slide position and breath direction in your tab, those symbols can be attached to the stems, flags, dots and beams of standard rhythmic notation, substituting the numbers for the note heads. Decoding the rhythms from the standard notation may be the easiest part of reading music; the combination of the two would really enhance the tab's usefulness.
It's very similar to my many tabs for fretted dulcimer.
Tom